Currently serving all of CaliforniaMed spa · IV hydration · GLP-1
Prove itbeforethey ask.
Purchasing
Drug purchase records
Advertising
Advertising & photo consents
Charts
Chart sample · 8 of 40
Chart 04 · not produced
Good faith exam
Protocols
Protocols & standing orders
Licensing
Staff license verification
Supervision
Medical director agreement
BoardProof · Baseline
Findings report
Verified 3 / 7 Findings 6
When a complaint reaches the Medical Board, nobody asks how good your results are. They ask for paper — the medical director agreement, the good faith exam, the documentary evidence — and they choose which charts. BoardProof reads your file the way an investigator would, grades what we find, and map out how to close each gap.
IndependentNo products, no commissions, no referral fees
Remote-firstScreen-share review · patient data minimized
StatewideCurrently serving all of California
Medical director agreementFictitious name permitStaff license verificationProtocols & standing ordersChart sample · five to tenAdvertising & photo consentsDrug purchase recordsGood faith exam · not producedMedical director agreementFictitious name permitStaff license verificationProtocols & standing ordersChart sample · five to tenAdvertising & photo consentsDrug purchase recordsGood faith exam · not produced
The gap
Most clinics aren't missing much. Just enough.
Medical director agreement
Common gap
Signed and current — but describing supervision that isn't actually happening.
Fictitious name permit
Check
Required to practice under a clinic name. It's public record — anyone can check yours in a minute.
Staff license verification
Check
Every license matched against what that person does in the treatment room.
Protocols & standing orders
Common gap
Written for the 2025 treatment menu. Signed by a former medical director.
A sample of charts
Check
Five to ten. Their choice of charts, not yours.
Advertising & photo consents
Common gap
Nobody has read the website against the rules since the day it launched.
Drug purchase records
Check
Sourcing, chain of custody, and DEA logs wherever controlled substances are kept.
Encounter record · extract
Good faith examination
Patient
TreatmentNeuromodulator · 40u
Treated12 Mar 2026
Examined14 Mar 20261
Examiner2
Standing orderSO-2022-043
Consentsigned
1Exam post-dates treatment. The examination has to come first — Bus. & Prof. Code § 2242(a).
2No examiner identified. Who performed it, and were they permitted to?
3Order predates the current menu and carries a former director's signature.
Illustrative recordIdentifiers redacted — we don't collect them
Where it turns serious
Five findings owners never see coming.
These are the ones that stop a conversation — the violations regulators and industry reviewers flag again and again in California clinics.
A vial nobody can trace.
Product bought online or from a “distributor” without a California license, at a price that seemed too good — and invoices that don't match the lot numbers.
Exposure
In November 2025 the FDA warned 18 online sellers of unapproved Botox. In 2024 the CDC traced counterfeit or mishandled injections to 22 patients in 11 states — half of them hospitalized.
FDA warning letters · Nov 2025 · CDC · B&P § 4169
The wrong hands on the syringe.
A medical assistant or LVN has been “helping” with neuromodulator. The Medical Board's position is that medical assistants may inject some medications — Botox isn't one of them. LVNs can't inject it either.
Exposure
Unlicensed practice is a crime: up to $10,000 and a year in jail. The statute reaches whoever aids or abets it — which can include the owner.
Bus. & Prof. Code § 2052(a)–(b)
An owner the law won't recognize.
The clinic is an LLC, or someone without a medical license holds the equity or makes clinical calls. In California a medical practice generally can't be organized that way.
Exposure
The structure itself can be the violation. And since January 2026, contract terms that give a private-equity or hedge-fund backer a say in clinical decisions are void.
In printing, a proof is the copy you check before the real run.
proofnoun · printing
We read your file as an investigator would, grade what we find, and hand you the list while fixing it is still a Tuesday afternoon's work.
The process
One week from first call to a graded file.
Day00
A short, confidential conversation about how your clinic runs — and where we would look first. If you'd like to talk specifics, we sign a mutual NDA before you do.
A plain-English engagement letter, a data-handling schedule that says exactly what we will and won't take, and a questionnaire that takes about thirty minutes.
The minimum, by name. Chart extracts de-identified and selected by date.
Supervised screen-share wherever possible, so we take custody of nothing. Agreements, licenses, protocols, charts, advertising — and the calendar.
Every finding keyed to the document first and the rule second, graded by consequence, with the fix beside it. Then a walkthrough, finding by finding.
Re-verification every quarter, advertising reviewed every month, and a fresh chart sample twice a year — because staff change, menus grow and websites get edited on a Friday night.
Typical timeline · depends on how quickly documents arrive
Sample report
What a graded file looks like.
A Baseline Inspection for a fictional clinic, built from the patterns regulators cite most. Every finding starts with the document, then what we saw and why it matters. The fixes stay in the client's copy.
Findings are composites of publicly reported enforcement patternsNot a real client
Brian EiselmanFounder · Reviewer
Who reads your file
One reviewer. Every file. Start to finish.
I'm Brian Eiselman, and I founded BoardProof after four years of service as an attorney for the U.S. Air Force. I have directed more than 100 investigations involving sensitive information and advised a 6,200-person organization across 28 locations, often in classified settings. I know what an investigator asks for first, because I used to be the one asking.
After active duty, I advised the Navy's Camp Lejeune claims program — more than 400,000 claims built on medical records and sensitive health data. Keeping that kind of file complete, accurate, and defensible was the job.
When you work with BoardProof, you work with me. Your file won't be handed off to a junior associate or a call center. I run a small business too, and I know your time is the scarcest thing you have.
Investigations directed
100+
Claims in the health-records program I advised
400,000+
Admitted to the California bar
2017
U.S. Air Force veteran · JAG Corps
LL.M., Law & Technology, UC Berkeley Dean's List, top 10%
J.D., University of San Diego
B.A., Business Management, Loyola Marymount University
BoardProof provides compliance verification, not legal representation. Working with BoardProof does not create an attorney–client relationship.
The record
The proof isn't ours to claim. It's on the record.
Every finding we write traces to something a regulator, a court or the Legislature has already put in writing. Three that shape how California clinics are read today:
$10,000
Fine against a med spa's medical director required to provide four hours a week of on-site supervision. He was there two to three hours a month.
Iowa Board of Medicine December 2025
$1,000
Nominal damages per patient for a negligent release of medical information in California. No proof of actual harm required.
Cal. Civil Code § 56.36(b)
1.1.26
SB 351 in force: contract terms that let a private-equity or hedge-fund backer reach into clinical decisions are void. Agreements signed before it were written for a different rule.
H&S Code § 1190 (SB 351) Effective 1 Jan 2026
The method
A binder tells you what to do. We check whether you did it.
A purchased protocol you don't follow isn't protection — it's a written standard you're demonstrably not meeting. So we don't sell documents. We test them against the room, the calendar and the chart.
Fig. 1 · Sampling
8 of 40 encounters sampled · 2 findings
We pick the charts. Because they will.
Five to ten encounters, drawn from dates you don't choose, reviewed de-identified. A file that's only right on the charts you'd hand over isn't right.
Fig. 2 · Advertising
Neuromodulator · per unit
from$9/ unit
Open-ended floor. Flagged for review against Bus. & Prof. Code § 651.
Illustrative listing
We read your website the way a complaint does.
Pricing language, before-and-after consents, claims, credentials — read line by line against California's advertising rules. “Starting at” is one of the first lines we flag.
Fig. 3 · Supervision
The requirement≈ 17 hrs / month
The calendar2–3 hrs / month
061218 hrs on site / month
We check the calendar, not just the contract.
In December 2025 the Iowa Board of Medicine fined a med spa's medical director $10,000. The rules required at least four hours a week of in-person supervision. He was there two or three hours a month. The board looked at the calendar.
Fig. 4 · Independence
0Products or software sold
0Vendor commissions
0Medical directors placed
Nothing to sell you but the finding.
We don't place medical directors, supply product, license software or take referral fees. When we say a document holds up, nobody's commission depends on it.
Contact
Find the gap before anyone else does.
Book a diagnostic by email or phone. Tell us a little about your clinic and we'll set a time. Conversations are kept confidential.
